Storing 1s and 0s – I need a new way to back up my stories

This year, two people I know have lost everything they were working on due to computer problems. A. lost her PhD when her netbook decided to pack it in, and G. lost all his writing projects when burglars nicked his laptop. It made me very grateful that I’ve been storing all my writing – including Scrivener product files – on Dropbox since last year. I’m getting network storage for home to back up and archive to but that won’t keep me entirely safe: last year, H. lost a bunch of things she was working on when her server died. She was lucky: it could be retrieved so it was a temporary loss.

So far, my strategy has simply been to store everything on Dropbox. That way, I have access from my desktop and laptop, and from anywhere else (other people’s computers, usually). Cloud storage solutions break, though, not often, but they do. Hence my plan for local network storage. A germ of paranoia has taken root in me so I think I will also store printed copies of finished stories. It feels sensible to have hard as well as soft copies. Hard copies are surprisingly resilient: I have a whole arch file full of stories I wrote as a teenager, and I recently read a story a friend of mine photocopied and mailed to me since only the printout remained.

Digital is not generally viewed as a suitable long-term preservation archival surrogate for print. It is currently regarded more as an access medium.
Digital versus print as a preservation format – expert views from international comparator libraries, British Library

Everything I write starts its life in digital format, either as a bunch of ideas and notes in Evernote, Scrivener drafts in Dropbox, or even notes on my phone. I use paper, but a lot of what I write on paper I either throw away or transcribe. I’ve been writing using digital means since I was 17 when I kept a Pascal diary in Computer Science instead of paying attention at lessons. Those early oeuvres are no longer available to me. They are stored on media that haven’t been used for years. Never mind 5.25″ floppies – none of my current computers have a 3.5″ floppy drive so I can’t read the many disks I so carefully filled and labelled at university and the first few years that I worked. It’s not a big deal: there’s nothing there I need, or want, particularly. But it makes me aware that the stories I write today might be difficult to access in 10 or 20 years’ time.

Technology changes. So although I use digital means of production, I’m going to take a leaf from the British Library’s book and start storing paper.

NaNoWriMo week three – we have developments, of sorts

NaNoWriMo 2011 participant badgeThis week I made a number of important changes. Not to the plot, as such, but to how I work.

First, I took a little time out every day to make sure I knew where I was going. A little bit of planning here and and there, a plot item or two. It gave me a list of scenes that needed to be written, making sure that I always knew had something that I could write. Waiting for ‘inspiration’ is a great way to get nothing written.

Half-way through the week I changed the tool I use to write with. I’m testing Scrivener because it now comes for Windows. (And it was recommended to me.) Previously, I’ve only ever used Microsoft Word to write and a combination of paper and Evernote to keep track of ideas and research. Even after years of working with Word I know it’s not the perfect tool for long documents. It’s not bad, it’s just not perfect. I’m hoping that Scrivener will make it a little easier to move sections around. That would save me lots of time.

I had a weekend away and learned that I still don’t have motion sickness but can write comfortably in the front seat of a car. I could only write two days out of three but managed to cover the word count for Saturday on Friday. So far, so good.

Last of all I changed the goalposts. It’s a good thing to do on a Monday morning. My target is now 65,000 words. As long as I write at least 2,100+ words a day for the next nine days, I will get there.

Tally at the end of week three: 43,751